PK111 JILI Games — Grid, Max Win and Why RTP Is Missing

JILI Games on PK111: Ten Titles, Side by Side

JILI games on PK111 span ten titles, running from a five-reel format with 1,024 ways to win down to a tap-based arcade game with no reels at all. Every one of them shares a single fact: JILI publishes no return-to-player figure for any of them, on any page, in any field. What each title does publish is its own — a maximum win, a stated volatility band, and a grid or way-count that actually varies quite a bit from one title to the next.

Title	Format	Max win	Volatility	RTP
Super Ace	5-reel, 4-row, 1,024 ways	10000x	Low to medium	Not published
Fortune Gems	3-reel, 3-row, 5 paylines	375x	Low to medium	Not published
Super Ace Deluxe	5-reel, 4-row, 1,024 ways	10000x	Medium	Not published
Fortune Gems 2	3-reel, 3-row, 5 paylines	10000x	Medium	Not published
Fortune Gems 3	3-reel, 3-row, 5 paylines	10125x	Medium to high	Not published
Money Coming	3-reel, 3-row, 1 line	10000x	Low to medium	Not published
Golden Empire	6-reel, up to 32,400 megaways	2000x	Low to medium	Not published
Wild Ace	5-reel, 4-row, 1,024 ways	1000x	Low to medium	Not published
Mega Ace	6-reel, 6-row, 46,656 ways	1500x	Medium	Not published
Dragon Treasure	Tap-based, no reels	2000x	Not published	Not published

Volatility here describes how spread out the outcomes are, not their size, and JILI states it in loose bands rather than a single number — low to medium, medium, or medium to high. Only Fortune Gems 3’s rewards-board mechanic reaches the highest of those three bands among these ten, and only Dragon Treasure’s tap-based format carries no volatility label at all, because it doesn’t map onto a reel grid the way JILI’s other titles do. A maximum win, by contrast, is a genuine published ceiling: the reels behind Super Ace’s figures and its follow-up both list 10000x, Money Coming’s single payline and Fortune Gems 2 match that figure exactly, and Fortune Gems 3 edges past all four of them at 10125x.

A grid or way-count on its own says little without the other two figures next to it. Golden Empire’s shifting megaways total resets every spin between 1 and 32,400, yet its published maximum sits at a comparatively modest 2000x — a reminder that a huge way-count and a huge ceiling aren’t the same claim, and JILI doesn’t promise both just because one is large.

How to check a JILI title before you play it

The ten titles above share a catalogue, not a rulebook, so what applies to Super Ace doesn’t automatically apply to Dragon Treasure. This is the same short process for any of them.

1. Sign in at PK111 and open the lobby, then filter by JILI or search for the title by name.
2. Open the game’s own info screen before staking anything — that’s where the real paytable and stake range live, not this page.
3. Expect no RTP field to appear there for any JILI title. Its absence is the documented answer here, not a loading error.
4. Compare the maximum win and volatility label against the table above, and treat the published ceiling as a boundary rather than something a normal session is likely to reach.
5. Where two names look alike — Fortune Gems against Fortune Gems 2, Super Ace against Super Ace Deluxe — check the maximum win figure specifically, since that’s what actually tells them apart.
6. Set a session budget before the first spin, separate from the maximum win figure. A published ceiling describes one round’s largest possible outcome, not a number a normal session is likely to touch.

Why not one of the ten carries a published RTP

JILI’s own site was checked directly for this section, across all fourteen of its official title pages — not just the ten covered here — and none of them carries an RTP field anywhere. A minimum stake is the same story: JILI doesn’t publish one for any title, so the in-game stake selector is the only place that figure actually shows up.

Third-party aggregators quote RTP numbers for JILI titles anyway, and they don’t agree with each other. One widely cited range for Super Ace alone runs from roughly 95.69% up to 97.8% — a two-point spread for the exact same reels, which is the clearest evidence that none of those sources is authoritative. Quoting either end of that range as fact would mean presenting somebody else’s guess as JILI’s own figure, so this site doesn’t.

There’s a second, separate confusion running through four of these ten titles. SlotCatalog lists Wild Ace’s changing-wild feature, Mega Ace’s 46,656-way grid, Fortune Gems 2 and Fortune Gems 3 under TaDa Gaming rather than JILI, and these specific titles do appear cloned or co-released across both studios. JILI’s own listing still carries all four, and nothing on JILI’s site disowns them, so this site treats the TaDa Gaming attribution as a point of confusion between aggregators rather than a correction to make.

Compare that with Super Ace Deluxe’s elimination multiplier, which carries no such split attribution anywhere this site checked — JILI names it directly as a follow-up to Super Ace, and no aggregator files it under a second studio. The confusion sits specifically with the four titles above, not with the catalogue generally.

For where JILI itself sits — licensing, catalogue size, the titles it’s best known for — JILI’s own studio profile covers that separately from these ten game pages. PG Soft sits at the other end of the same question: the PG Soft slots list carries a published RTP for every title in it, even where the number stays off PG Soft’s own visible page and sits only in the data behind it.

Common mix-ups across the ten titles